Friday, May 24, 2013
 

Del. LeMunyon opposes W&OD Trail funding

Virginia House Delegate Jim LeMunyon (R-67th District), whose district is located just south of the Reston area, includes Chantilly, and extends down to I-66, is opposed to funding for the W&OD Trail improvements that are included in the list of projects to be funded with the new transportation bill. At a recent panel discussion hosted by the Northern Virginia Transportation Alliance, a group heavily supported by the construction and real estate sector, LeMunyon voiced his opposition to some of the bike/ped and transit projects:
Del. Jim LeMunyon (R-67th) told the panel that some projects on the list – such as bus shelters, pedestrian bridges and lighting on the Washington & Old Dominion Regional Trail – ran afoul of the vision many legislators had when supporting the transportation bill, especially its regional component.
Maybe if he were to ride a bike from Purcellville to Shirlington on a nice spring weekend or during rush hour he might begin to understand the regional importance of the W&OD Trail. Perhaps his attitude explains why bike conditions in the Chantilly area are so poor, and why many of his constituents have to drive to the W&OD Trail to find a good place to ride. If you live in that area you might want to tell Del. LeMunyon that well-built and maintained bike projects are a critical part of our transportation network and that you support improvements to the W&OD Trail.

The project list that was discussed at the meeting is being developed by the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (same acronym as the above NVTA but a totally different group comprised of regional government officials) and is based on the TransAction 2040 list. TransAction 2040 is "a regional transportation plan for Northern Virginia, including transportation improvements of regional significance. The NVTA revises and amends this plan every five years."

Some of the trial projects on the TransAction 2040 list include the following. We especially like Arlington's plan to expand and enhance their on- and off-road bike network to facilitate expanded use of bicycles in the corridor:

  • Construct W&OD Trail Crossing (improvements) at Crestview Drive 
  • Construct trail along VA 7 from Leesburg to Alexandria 
  • Construct Van Buren Street Trail to Dulles Metrorail Station (extension from Folly Lick Trail) 
  • Construct the Sugarland Run Trail from existing terminus to pedestrian access pavilion of the future Herndon Metrorail station 
  • Construct a trail along Claiborne Parkway from Loudoun County Parkway to Ryan Road 
  • Construct a trail along VA 772 from Belmont Ridge Road to Ryan Road 
  • Construct a trail along Godwin Drive from Nokesville Road to Sudley Road 
  • Construct a trail along VA 659 (Belmont Ridge Road) from VA 7 to Ryan Road 
  • Construct a trail along Prince William Parkway from Nokesville Road to Dumfries Road 
  • Construct a trail along the Tri-County Parkway from Braddock Road to Sudley Road 
  • Introduce and expand bikesharing services in the Arlington portion of the corridor 
  • Reconstruct Rosslyn Circle with "Complete Streets" improvements 
  • City of Falls Church Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Traffic Calming improvements 
  • Expand and enhance Arlington’s network of on- and off-street bicycle/pedestrian facilities to facilitate expanded use of bicycles in the corridor 
  • Construct a trail along I‐66 from Sully Road to Paddington Lane 
  • Complete trail along U.S. 29 between Dixie Hill Road and Vietch Street 
  • Construct a trail along U.S. 50 from Nutley Street to Arlington Road

Labels: , ,

Comments:
The first 4 items on the list are repeated, and the Custis extension along I-66 to US 15/Haymarket is omitted.
Otherwise, I support these initiatives!
 
Thanks for pointing out the repeated items. I've removed them. It is unfortunate that the extension of the Custis Trail along I-66 is not included.
 
Hopefully the trail on Belmont Ridge Road will cause improvement to where the W&OD crosses Belmont Ridge -- improving the line of sight and slowing the traffic down would be great.
 
The response I received from Del LeMunyon:
"Tom,

I believe you may be referring to funds for the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority. These funds are intended for motorized mass transit and autos. I support the greater use of bicycles and trails, but from other funding sources. I did not intend to offend you or any other bicyclists. In fact, I applaud your use of that particular form of transportation.

Kind regards,

Jim LeMunyon
Member, Virginia House of Delegates
67th District"
 
Del. LeMunyon doesn't seem to know much about the NVTA or about the transportation bill. Does he think "transportation" means only motorized transportation? According to the text of the transportation bill, "such revenues shall be used for additional urban or secondary road construction; for other capital improvements that reduce congestion; for other transportation capital improvements which have been approved by the most recent long range transportation plan adopted by the Authority"

MWCOG approves the long range plan, and one part of that plan is the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.

The long range plan for Fairfax County needs some work. The projects for the County need to be updated and made to conform with the county bicycle master plan.
 

Post a Comment

Contact FABB via email: info@fabb-bikes.org

Subscribe to the
FABB e-newsletter


Subscribe to posts:
[Atom 1.0] or [RSS 2.0]





  Bike to Work Day 2015 at Wiehle Station

  Transportation choices

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Archives

  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007