Saturday, October 11, 2008
 

W&OD/Fairfax Co Parkway Connector Trail

Today my wife and I were out for a ride that took us along the trail that connects the Fairfax Co Parkway Trail to the W&OD Trail. We were pleased to see that the vegetation had been cut back and the trail was clear for a change.

In the past this short trail had become very overgrown and there was so little room in some places that it was difficult for two cyclists to pass each other. In one place you couldn't see oncoming cyclists either. Because this is a side trail off of the W&OD Trail, it doesn't get the tender loving care of the main trail. We're lucky if the trail crew visits once a year to cut back all the accumulated foliage.

Well this year a couple of enterprising cyclists took matters into their own hands (we won't mention their names). They brought their gardening tools and cut back the trees and weeds and made life a little bit better for the rest of us. Thanks guys.

Labels: ,

Comments:
Bruce, the W&OD is managed by NVRPA, advocated by FOWOD, and adopts out trail segments to individuals and groups. Adopters keep their segments looking nice. We also have a Trail Patrol and all of us do things like clear trail debris, report graffiti, look for dangerous conditions and such. I know I went behind some DVP trucks in Vienna recently and picked up some branches their trucks inadvertendtly dropped that could catch other cyclists' wheels. (Hard to see branches on asphalt sometimes.) We have park rangers for the W&OD, as well as a park manager, and you can see how there is always someone mowing and tending to the trail.

The photos of the Fairfax Co Pkwy trail made it look pretty neglected. Grass growing up through cracks is sad. Can you clarify "whose" trail it is and who is primarily responsible for it? Is it VDOT's trail? The County's trail? Do they adopt it out or do they adopt out segments of it out to people who might help shoulder some of the burden?

For a trail to "look good," it requires dedicated staff and volunteers to support them and to look after it on a rather daily basis.
 
NVRPA does a great job of keeping the main part of the trail clear of debris. It's just that some side trails, like the W&OD/Fx Co Parkway connection and the side trail to the Town Center get neglected. I'll suggest to the two mystery clippers that they could adopt the segment of trail that they cleared.

The Fx Co Parkway trail is mostly owned and maintained by VDOT. I think there may be one or two short segments that are Fx Co responsibility. VDOT does respond to complaints if one is persistent and knows who to call. I use 703-383-VDOT (703-383-8368) and ask for a project or task number that can be used to track the complaint. However, it's going to take more than just fixing spots. The entire trail needs to be repaved.

Fx Co will say that it's VDOT's trail, and VDOT will say they won't do any major upgrades until the county sets aside money, which it never does. I'll ask Charlie Strunk how we can get money in the budget for repaving. It should have been included in the last Transportation Bond, but since requests are submitted by each district, a long, multi-district trail gets neglected (unless it's managed by the Co. Park Authority).
 

Post a Comment

Contact FABB via email: info@fabb-bikes.org

Subscribe to the
FABB e-newsletter


Subscribe to posts:
[Atom 1.0] or [RSS 2.0]





  Bike to Work Day 2015 at Wiehle Station

  Transportation choices

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Archives

  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007